New Airport Fuel Control System Modernizes Automation for Major Fuel

Farm at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport

FSM Group

FSM Group is a North American professional services group specializing in aviation fuel. Key offerings include into plane services, fuel farm maintenance and operations, fuel logistics, and ground support equipment services. FSM Group has been managing the Delta Air Lines fuel farm at the Hartsfield–Jackson Atlanta International Airport since October 2020. Prior to the change in management, Delta managed their own fuel farm.

Over the past few years, significant upgrades have been made across the fuel farm to replace aging equipment, improve the electrical infrastructure and upgrade software and systems. Since 2008, Varec’s FuelsManager® suite of software applications and 8130 remote terminal unit (RTU) have been an integral component of the legacy fuel management system at the Delta fuel farm. As part of the most recent updates, Varec provided its Airport Fuel Control System, which included the control cabinet and operator station, an 8810 RTU, as well as a FuelsManager software upgrade. These enhancements provided significant improvements to various automation and control functionality across the fuel farm.

Situation

The fuel farm for Delta Air Lines was originally built in the 1970’s, and many of the systems put in place over 40 years ago to help manage the day-to-day operations, were still in place a few years ago. The long-time general manager for the fuel farm, formerly a Delta employee and now working for FSM Group, began designing the plans for a major upgrade across the entire fuel farm nearly a decade ago.

The control panel was over 40 years old, analog, very large (7’x14’x3’), and took up too much space in the control room. The terminal manager wanted a new control panel that included a cabinet where they could store other parts of the system in order to streamline space. He also wanted a modern PLC as the current PLC was no longer functioning efficiently being an older system with outdated technology that was difficult to update and maintain.

The biggest PLC issue revolved around managing pumps and valves during peak departure times that would drive a high spike in fuel demand. During these peaks, where there could be 20 or more planes on the ground being fueled at the same time, the hydrant pump pressure would drop too low. The system would respond by turning on more pumps. However, before the entire system could recalibrate each time an additional pump was brought online, the PLC would trigger another pump to start. These premature starts would cause the pressure to rise too high. It had become a common occurrence that the pressure would reach critical high levels during these peak periods, which triggered an emergency fuel shut off (ESFO) and delayed aircraft fueling. To try and mitigate, the fuel farm operators had to spend a lot of time manually managing the pumps during peak periods. In doing so, they were spending less time performing the day-to-day maintenance checks on the tanks.
There were other updates already completed, underway or still pending as a part of the large tank farm upgrade project, such as replacing the aged communication and electrical wires and cables, updating the computers and servers, upgrading the RTU, and updating the FuelsManager software. Several vendors were involved at different stages of the project, working collaboratively on their respective areas of expertise.

Testimonial

“Knowing that things are running on autopilot provides me with a great sense of relief. ” I’ve worked with the Varec team for over a decade and the new system they put in place has helped us achieve a higher level of operational efficiency. I also have confidence that my financial reports and records are accurate due to things being fully integrated and automated.”

Tommy Steele, General Manager – Delta Fuel Farm Operated by FSM Group

Solution

After several consultations with Varec engineers on some of these issues the facility was having, the general manager selected Varec for multiple aspects of the fuel farm upgrade. The biggest component of Varec’s scope was deploying its Airport Fuel Control System (AFCS). Key physical components of the system included a control cabinet that housed the PLC and the manual control panel (MCP) on the doors. The 8810 RTU, the new tank gauging interface, was also housed in the cabinet. The new PLC had advanced logic to provide better automation and control for the fuel farm’s pumps and valves.
The PLC logic is the key automation component of AFCS. It was designed to operate using the first-in, first-off (FiFo) smart pump sequencing instead of the traditional lead lag method. With FiFo, run times would be better distributed across the pumps, eliminating quick starts and stops for some pumps and long run times for others. This results in a more optimal performance and reduces the wear and tear on the first few pumps in sequence. Now, as pumps are brought online to meet the fuel demand, the pump that has been running the longest will be shut off as demand decreases. Another key component of AFCS is to base the automation logic on both pressure and flow to determine when to start and stop pumps.
Not required for AFCS, but selected by FSM Group, included some of Varec’s other products. The new tank gauging communication interface, the 8810 RTU, replaced the legacy 8130 RTU. More powerful than its predecessor, the 8810 RTU is Ethernet-enabled, uses the OPC Unified Architecture (UA) communication server, and supports up to six modules, 24 channels, and 400 tanks. The existing Enraf 854 Servo Gauges were replaced with NMS81 Servo Gauges. This device upgrade was not a part of the original project, but FSM Group decided to make the change during the project to eliminate performance issues and ensure long-term technology compatibility with the other enhancements. Lastly, the facility’s FuelsManager Inventory Management, Accounting and Movement Tracking modules were also upgraded as a part of the technology refresh to the latest operating systems.

Results

Benefits of the new system were realized almost immediately. The new control panel and PLC streamlined operations. The need for manual intervention to help manage the pumps was completely eliminated. With the MCP built into the front of the cabinet, operators can easily visualize how things are running at any moment in time. At-a-glance, they can see outgoing system pressure and flow, which tank(s) are actively receiving from the pipeline, which tank(s) are issuing to an aircraft, and the number of pumps currently running. In the past, this visualization was only available at computer work stations in the control room. Operators can also individually route control of each device to the automated system or control them manually from the panel with the flip of a switch, providing an operations backup control and monitoring workstation. MCP also serves as an automation system back up if the primary control station software or the PLC were to stop working.

The new servo gauges helped eliminate another manual process. Previously, operators would manually take a density reading each night from each gauge, and input those readings into the system. It could take up to 45 minutes per tank to complete this task. Now, standard and real-time density data captured in the NMS81 Servo Gauges automatically updates FuelsManager, freeing up operators to focus on other tasks.
FuelsManager had been installed for over a decade, but the recent upgrades have refined some of the tracking, reporting, and reconciliation processes. Through the standard reports available, operators can effectively manage inventory levels to understand gross and net, track and reconcile gains and losses, and manage days of supply, a critical metric to know at all times.
The facility also tracks and records movements with FuelsManager. This feature is used as an additional check and balance within the system. Movements are tracked from the pipeline into the tanks and out of the tanks through each allocation transaction. With the standard pipeline report, they know when each valve was opened, which tank the fuel went into, and the start and stop times for each transaction. They are also able to compare what the pipeline says was sent to what was actually received to determine if there are variances. There haven’t been any variances outside of tolerance since all of the upgrades have been in place. Fuel receipts and disbursements are extremely accurate, even down to the into plane services.